EDIT: Of course there is the whole bit about HG not even being entitled to the copyrights in the first place but that is, unfortunately, something that has to be determined in court with the past precedent The only point I give HG is that some of the PGI/CGL art they found is in fact based on and similar to the unseen mecha but I'm not sure they really have a case for damages based on that alone (repeat IANAL). (and the /r/OutreachHPG link covers the rest) Probably best to just link the REddit post, as it covers a number of details. I wonder if HBS could countersue HG for entering a complaint in bad faith (IANAL). HGs pictorial examples of HBS' alleged infringement are laughable. It seems pretty spiteful and greedy since at this point he doesn't control Battletech and could not force PGI or Catalyst to do things differently. Battletech? That's really all there is to it.

The examples do appear to be very close in design though I'm not sure the legal requirements for derivative/interpretive artworksĪlso they are suing Jordon and HBS because. I'm not sure any of it is in actual commercial products but that may be besides the point. So basically HG found some concept art on Catalyst Game Labs and PGI sites that they believe infringes.

Sarna snub nose ppc